Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Fidelity National Insurance Company v. The Robbins Group and Sons, LLC

Plaintiff:Fidelity National Insurance Company
Defendant:The Robbins Group and Sons, LLC
 
Case Number:4:2009cv01136
Filed:July 17, 2009
 
Court:Missouri Eastern District Court
Office:St. Louis Office [ Court Info ]
County:St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge Audrey G. Fleissig
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$200,000,000.00
Search for this case: Fidelity National Insurance Company v. The Robbins Group and Sons, LLC
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fidelity National Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Robbins Group and Sons, LLC
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.