Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Flowers Baking Co. of New Orleans, LLC. v. Hancock

Plaintiff:Flowers Baking Co. of New Orleans, LLC.
Defendant:Thomas E. Hancock, Jr.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00685
Filed:September 24, 2009
 
Court:Mississippi Southern District Court
Office:Southern Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:District Judge Louis Guirola Jr.
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$75,000.00
Search for this case: Flowers Baking Co. of New Orleans, LLC. v. Hancock
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Flowers Baking Co. of New Orleans, LLC.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas E. Hancock, Jr.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.