Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Adams v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi

Plaintiff: Reginald Adams
Defendant: City of Aberdeen, Mississippi
 
Case Number: 4:2007cv00158
Filed: November 30, 2007
 
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Eastern Office [ Court Info ]
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge James C. Sumner
 
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Employment
Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Search for this case: Adams v. City of Aberdeen, Mississippi
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Adams
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Aberdeen, Mississippi
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.