Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Beneficial Mississippi, Inc. v. Bobbie J. Thomas

Plaintiff: Beneficial Mississippi, Inc.
Defendant: Bobbie J. Thomas
 
Case Number: 5:2007cv00203
Filed: November 2, 2007
 
Court: Mississippi Southern District Court
Office: Western Office [ Court Info ]
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Honorable David C. Bramlette III
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge John M. Roper
 
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes - Consumer Credit
Cause: 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Search for this case: Beneficial Mississippi, Inc. v. Bobbie J. Thomas
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beneficial Mississippi, Inc.
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobbie J. Thomas
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.