Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

WARD v. PIEDMONT FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff:MARK A. WARD
Defendant:PIEDMONT FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
 
Case Number:1:2007cv00124
Filed:February 20, 2007
 
Court:North Carolina Middle District Court
Office:Durham Office [ Court Info ]
County:Forsyth
Presiding Judge:CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY JR.
Referring Judge:MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Other Civil Rights
Cause:28:1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: WARD v. PIEDMONT FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK A. WARD
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PIEDMONT FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.