Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION v. Valenzuela

Plaintiff:BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION
Defendant:Luis Castaneda Valenzuela
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00797
Filed:October 12, 2009
 
Court:North Carolina Middle District Court
Office:NCMD Office [ Court Info ]
County:Guilford
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Referring Judge:MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$75,000.00
Search for this case: BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION v. Valenzuela
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORPORATION
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luis Castaneda Valenzuela
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.