Ruff v. The United States
| Case Number: | 1:2005cv00248 |
|---|---|
| Filed: | November 5, 2005 |
| Court: | North Carolina Western District Court |
| Office: | Asheville Office [ Court Info ] |
| Presiding Judge: | Lacy Thornburg |
| Nature of Suit: | Other Statutes - Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| Cause: | 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ruff v. The United States | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Ruff | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: The United States | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: North Carolina Civil Rights Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.