Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Travelers Indemnity Company v. Diboco Fire Sprinklers, Inc.

Plaintiff:Travelers Indemnity Company
Defendant:Diboco Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2008cv00548
Filed:December 18, 2008
 
Court:North Carolina Western District Court
Office:Real Property: Other Office [ Court Info ]
County:Buncombe
Presiding Judge:District Judge Lacy Thornburg
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell
 
Nature of Suit:Real Property - All Other Real Property
Cause:Diversity
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:28:1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Search for this case: Travelers Indemnity Company v. Diboco Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travelers Indemnity Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diboco Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.