Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Dippel v. Philips Products, Inc.

Plaintiff:Daniel Dippel
Defendant:Philips Products, Inc.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00253
Filed:July 10, 2009
 
Court:North Carolina Western District Court
Office:Asheville Office [ Court Info ]
County:Buncombe
Presiding Judge:District Judge Martin Reidinger
Presiding Judge:District Judge Lacy Thornburg
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Defendant
Search for this case: Dippel v. Philips Products, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philips Products, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Dippel
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.