Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Rutherford County v. Bond Safeguard Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Rutherford County
Defendant:Bond Safeguard Insurance Company
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00292
Filed:July 31, 2009
 
Court:North Carolina Western District Court
Office:Asheville Office [ Court Info ]
County:RutherFord
Presiding Judge:District Judge Martin Reidinger
Presiding Judge:District Judge Lacy Thornburg
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$26,404,000.00
Search for this case: Rutherford County v. Bond Safeguard Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rutherford County
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bond Safeguard Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.