Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Hill v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Barbara Hill
Defendant:Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00414
Filed:September 23, 2009
 
Court:North Carolina Western District Court
Office:Charlotte Office [ Court Info ]
County:Mecklenburg
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Hill v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Hill
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.