Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Powell v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Lisa A. Powell
Defendant:Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
 
Case Number:5:2009cv00110
Filed:October 5, 2009
 
Court:North Carolina Western District Court
Office:Statesville Office [ Court Info ]
County:Alexander
Presiding Judge:District Judge Richard Voorhees
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Powell v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa A. Powell
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.