Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Perman v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

Plaintiff:Kirk Perman
Defendant:UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00018
Filed:April 13, 2009
 
Court:North Dakota District Court
Office:Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County:Burleigh
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:29:1132 ERISA - Employee Benefits
Search for this case: Perman v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kirk Perman
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.