Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Eaton v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.

Plaintiff:Clifford Eaton
Defendant:Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
 
Case Number:2:2009cv00048
Filed:May 11, 2009
 
Court:North Dakota District Court
Office:Northeastern Office [ Court Info ]
County:Burleigh
Presiding Judge:Judge Ralph R. Erickson
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge Karen K. Klein
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Karen K. Klein
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Consumer Credit
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Defendant
Search for this case: Eaton v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifford Eaton
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.