Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

BNSF Railway Company v. Superior Grains, Inc.

Plaintiff:BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:Superior Grains, Inc.
 
Case Number:4:2009cv00001
Filed:January 8, 2009
 
Court:North Dakota District Court
Office:Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. Office [ Court Info ]
County:Divide
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Amount Demanded:$175,000.00
Search for this case: BNSF Railway Company v. Superior Grains, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Grains, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.