Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

United States of America v. Engmann

Plaintiff:United States of America
Defendant:Michelle L Engmann
 
Case Number:4:2009cv00051
Filed:August 19, 2009
 
Court:North Dakota District Court
Office:Northwestern Office [ Court Info ]
County:Williams
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Presiding Judge:Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
Cause:28:1345 Default of Student Loan
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: United States of America v. Engmann
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle L Engmann
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.