Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Borkhuis v. OM Financial Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Mary Borkhuis
Defendant:OM Financial Life Insurance Company
 
Case Number:4:2009cv00065
Filed:October 13, 2009
 
Court:North Dakota District Court
Office:Northwestern Office [ Court Info ]
County:Ward
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Presiding Judge:Judge Daniel L. Hovland
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Charles S. Miller Jr.
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$235,000.00
Search for this case: Borkhuis v. OM Financial Life Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Borkhuis
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OM Financial Life Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.