Duncan Aviation, Inc. v. River Run Projects
| Plaintiff: | Duncan Aviation, Inc. |
|---|
| Defendant: | River Run Projects |
|---|
| Counter Claimant: | River Run Projects |
|---|
| Counter Defendant: | Duncan Aviation, Inc. |
|---|
| |
| Case Number: | 4:2007cv03035 |
| Filed: | February 2, 2007 |
| |
| Court: | Nebraska District Court |
|---|
| Office: | 4 Lincoln Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Lancaster |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Richard G. Kopf |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge David L. Piester |
| |
| Nature of Suit: | Contract - Other Contract |
| Cause: | 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Jurisdiction: | Diversity |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| April 25, 2007 | 17 | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - 1. Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (filing 11) is granted; 2. This court's March 19, 2007 judgment (filing 9) dismissing this action for lack of personal jurisdiction is vacated; 3. The proposed brief (filing 13, ex. 5) and evidence (filing 13, exs. 2-4) opposing the motion to dismiss which were submitted in support of the motion for relief from judgment are accepted and deemed to be filed in opposition to the motion to dismiss; 4. Defendant s hall have until May 4, 2007 to file a reply brief and index of evidence; 5. The motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (filing 3) will be deemed submitted on May 5, 2007; 6. The Clerk of the Court shall reopen this matter for statistical purposes and make an entry in the CM/ECF system indicating that the motion to dismiss (filing 3) is ripe for decision on May 5, 2007. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf.(CS, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to
PACER is required.
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.