Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Dancy v. Five Star Quality Care d/b/a Ashland Care Center

Plaintiff:Dana A Dancy
Defendant:Five Star Quality Care d/b/a Ashland Care Center
 
Case Number:4:2009cv03181
Filed:August 26, 2009
 
Court:Nebraska District Court
Office:4 Lincoln Office [ Court Info ]
County:Saunders
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom
Referring Judge: Richard G. Kopf (REFERRAL JUDGE)
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Dancy v. Five Star Quality Care d/b/a Ashland Care Center
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana A Dancy
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Five Star Quality Care d/b/a Ashland Care Center
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.