Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

United States of America v. Schmeeckle

Plaintiff:United States of America
Defendant:Douglas L. Schmeeckle
 
Case Number:8:2008cv00437
Filed:October 1, 2008
 
Court:Nebraska District Court
Office:Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office [ Court Info ]
County:Adams
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:28:1345 Foreclosure
Search for this case: United States of America v. Schmeeckle
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas L. Schmeeckle
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.