Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Adesta Communications v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Plaintiff:Adesta Communications
Defendant:Utica Mutual Insurance
 
Case Number:8:2008cv03046
Filed:March 13, 2008
 
Court:Nebraska District Court
Office:8 Omaha Office [ Court Info ]
County:Douglas
Presiding Judge:Judge Laurie Smith Camp
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Defendant
Search for this case: Adesta Communications v. Utica Mutual Insurance
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adesta Communications
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utica Mutual Insurance
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.