Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Clock-Feeney v. Sanborn Regional School District, SAU No. 17

Plaintiff:Michele Clock-Feeney
Defendant:Sanborn Regional School District, SAU No. 17
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00218
Filed:June 26, 2009
 
Court:New Hampshire District Court
Office:Concord Office [ Court Info ]
County:Belknap
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe
Presiding Judge:Magistrate Judge James R. Muirhead
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:29:0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Clock-Feeney v. Sanborn Regional School District, SAU No. 17
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele Clock-Feeney
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanborn Regional School District, SAU No. 17
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.