Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

United States Of America v. Seventy-Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Five Dollars and No Cents ($74, 705.00),

 
Case Number:1:2009cv04686
Filed:October 29, 2009
 
Court:New York Eastern District Court
Office:Drug Related Seizure of Property Office [ Court Info ]
Presiding Judge:Judge Brian M. Cogan
 
Nature of Suit:Forfeiture / Penalty - Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Search for this case: United States Of America v. Seventy-Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Five Dollars and No Cents ($74, 705.00),
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search for: United States Of America
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search for: Seventy-Four Thousand, Seven Hundred Five Dollars and No Cents ($74, 705.00)
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.