Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Virginia Surety Company, Inc. v. Trammell Crow Residential Company

Plaintiff:Virginia Surety Company, Inc.
Defendant:Trammell Crow Residential Company
 
Case Number:2:2009cv03226
Filed:July 27, 2009
 
Court:New York Eastern District Court
Office:Central Islip Office [ Court Info ]
County:Suffolk
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Leonard D. Wexler
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge E. Thomas Boyle
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Insurance
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Virginia Surety Company, Inc. v. Trammell Crow Residential Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virginia Surety Company, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Trammell Crow Residential Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.