Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

FEDEX Customer Information Services, Inc. v. Kabbaz

Plaintiff:FEDEX Customer Information Services, Inc.
Defendant:Alexander Kabbaz
 
Case Number:2:2009cv04056
Filed:September 21, 2009
 
Court:New York Eastern District Court
Office:Central Islip Office [ Court Info ]
County:Suffolk
Presiding Judge:Judge Joanna Seybert
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge William D. Wall
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Other Contract
Cause:28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$35,000.00
Search for this case: FEDEX Customer Information Services, Inc. v. Kabbaz
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FEDEX Customer Information Services, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexander Kabbaz
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.