Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Doe v. Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP)

Plaintiff:Jane Doe
Defendant:Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP)
 
Case Number:1:2009cv01187
Filed:October 23, 2009
 
Court:New York Northern District Court
Office:Albany Office [ Court Info ]
County:Albany
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge David R. Homer
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Doe v. Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP)
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP)
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.