Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Ambrose v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Company Inc.

Plaintiff:Michael Ambrose
Defendant:Delaware & Hudson Railway Company Inc.
 
Case Number:3:2009cv01186
Filed:October 23, 2009
 
Court:New York Northern District Court
Office:Binghamton Office [ Court Info ]
County:Delaware
Presiding Judge:Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles
 
Nature of Suit:Torts - Injury - Federal Employers Liability
Cause:45:51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$20,000,000.00
Search for this case: Ambrose v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Company Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Ambrose
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Delaware & Hudson Railway Company Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.