Cummins v. Suntrust Capital Markets, Inc. et al
Robert P. Cummins |
Suntrust Capital Markets, Inc., Amit Hazan and Jonathan Block |
1:2007cv04633 |
June 1, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
John G. Koeltl |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re:#98696 57 MOTION to Alter Judgment Reargument, and to Amend the Court's Judgment filed by Robert P. Cummins. Because the plaintiff has failed to establish a basis for reconsideration or relief under Rules 59 and 60(b) and because he has failed to show exceptional circumstances sufficient for such relief, the plaintiff's motion is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/16/2010) (tve) Modified on 3/22/2010 (eef). |
Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER:#97934 The Court has considered all of parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed, such arguments are either moot or without merit. For all of the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 32 and to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and closing this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 8/20/2009) (jpo) Modified on 8/21/2009 (jab). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.