Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

MUR Shipping BV v. Agrenco Madeira Comoercio Internacional LDA

Plaintiff: MUR Shipping BV
Defendant: Agrenco Madeira Comoercio Internacional LDA
 
Case Number: 1:2008cv04280
Filed: May 6, 2008
 
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Contract: Marine Office [ Court Info ]
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Judge Gerard E. Lynch
 
Nature of Suit: Contract - Marine
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Other
Search for this case: MUR Shipping BV v. Agrenco Madeira Comoercio Internacional LDA
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MUR Shipping BV
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Agrenco Madeira Comoercio Internacional LDA
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.