Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

CMA CGM (America) LLC v. Aruvil International, Inc.

Plaintiff: CMA CGM (America) LLC
Defendant: Aruvil International, Inc.
 
Case Number: 1:2008cv04496
Filed: May 14, 2008
 
Court: New York Southern District Court
Office: Contract: Marine Office [ Court Info ]
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Judge Paul A. Crotty
 
Nature of Suit: Contract - Marine
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 46:1701 Violation of Shipping Act of 1984
Amount Demanded: $3,000.00
Search for this case: CMA CGM (America) LLC v. Aruvil International, Inc.
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CMA CGM (America) LLC
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aruvil International, Inc.
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.