Rothstein et al v. Fung et al
| Greta Rothstein and Konstantinos Karetsos |
| Kuosen Fung, Peter Bon Viso, Daniel Glatter, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and unknown aidors and abettors |
| 1:2008cv05123 |
| June 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER:# 97165 Finally, I note that even if Ms. Rothstein had shown that her case had merit, she has not described any efforts to locate counsel on her own. To the contrary, she affirmatively states that she has not attempted to retain cou nsel on her own, citing her age and the fact that she lives aborad. Neither of these facts excuses her from making this showing. Accordingly, Ms. Rothstein's motion (Docket Item 6) is denied without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed application should specifically address the factors identified above. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/4/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jfe) Modified on 3/6/2009 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
