Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Cryan v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, L.L.C.

Plaintiff:John Patrick Cryan
Defendant:Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, L.L.C.
 
Case Number:1:2008cv05431
Filed:June 16, 2008
 
Court:New York Southern District Court
Office:Other Statutory Actions Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:Judge John E. Sprizzo
 
Nature of Suit:Other Statutes - Other Statutory Actions
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Search for this case: Cryan v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, L.L.C.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Patrick Cryan
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, L.L.C.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.