Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Clough Projects International Pty. Ltd. v. Ocean Diving Centre Limited

Plaintiff:Clough Projects International Pty. Ltd.
Defendant:Ocean Diving Centre Limited
 
Case Number:1:2008cv09240
Filed:October 28, 2008
 
Court:New York Southern District Court
Office:Contract: Marine Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge:Judge John E. Sprizzo
Presiding Judge:Judge Unassigned
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Marine
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:1333 Admiralty
Search for this case: Clough Projects International Pty. Ltd. v. Ocean Diving Centre Limited
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clough Projects International Pty. Ltd.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ocean Diving Centre Limited
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.