Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Hempel Coatings Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti v. Demre Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S.

Plaintiff:Hempel Coatings Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti
Defendant:Demre Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv05899
Filed:June 26, 2009
 
Court:New York Southern District Court
Office:Foley Square Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge:Judge Robert P. Patterson
 
Nature of Suit:Contract - Marine
Cause:28:1333 Admiralty
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Amount Demanded:$75,000.00
Search for this case: Hempel Coatings Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti v. Demre Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hempel Coatings Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd. Sti
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Demre Denizcilik Ve Ticaret A.S.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.