Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Does 1-3
(What's this?)
What is the EasyEdit button?
This website gets better when people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help)
| Case Number: | 6:2005cv06274 |
|---|---|
| Filed: | May 26, 2005 |
| Court: | New York Western District Court |
| Office: | Rochester Office [ Court Info ] |
| Presiding Judge: | Hon. David G. Larimer |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Copyrights |
| Cause: | 17:501 Copyright Infringement |
| Jury Demanded By: | None |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2005 | 6 |  ORDER:Plaintiffs' motion for expedited discovery is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may serve immediate discovery on RIT to obtain the identity of each Doe defendant by serving a Rule 45 subpoena that seeks information sufficient to identify each Doe defend ant, including the name, school address, permanent home address, telephone number, e-mail address, and Media Access Control addresses for each Doe defendant. The subpoena shall be returnable on or after June 29, 2005. Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Court's Order along with the subpoena on RIT. Service on RIT through its attorneys, Nixon Peabody LLP, Clinton Square, Rochester, New York, shall be deemed sufficient. RIT shall have until June 17, 2007: (1) to notify each Doe defendant th at it intends to disclose the requested ISP identifying information to plaintiffs, and (2) to send to each Doe defendant a copy of the subpoena and this Court's Order, through electronic means or otherwise. If RIT or any of the Doe defendants wi sh to move to quash the subpoena, they must do so on or before June 27, 2005. Such motions must be directed to this Court with reference this case at 100 State Street, Rochester, New York 14614. RIT shall not destroy any of the ISP identifying infor mation from its databases until it has complied with the subpoena in full or upon further order of the Court. The information disclosed to plaintiffs in response to the Rule 45 subpoena will be used by plaintiffs solely for the purpose of protecting their rights under the Copyright Act. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 5/31/05. (EMA, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Does 1-3 | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Atlantic Recording Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search for: Does 1-3 | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.