Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Givhan v. Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration

Plaintiff:Nicole M Givhan
Defendant:Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
 
Case Number:1:2009cv02567
Filed:November 3, 2009
 
Court:Ohio Northern District Court
Office:Cleveland Office [ Court Info ]
County:Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Vernelis K. Armstrong
 
Nature of Suit:Social Security - Supplemental Security Income
Cause:42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Givhan v. Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole M Givhan
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Adminstration
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.