Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Antique Auto Battery Co. v. Honeywell International Inc.

Plaintiff:Antique Auto Battery Co.
Defendant:Honeywell International, Inc.
 
Case Number:5:2009cv00174
Filed:January 23, 2009
 
Court:Ohio Northern District Court
Office:Trademark Office [ Court Info ]
County:Summit
Presiding Judge:Judge David D. Dowd Jr.
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Benita Y. Pearson
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Trademark
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Search for this case: Antique Auto Battery Co. v. Honeywell International Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antique Auto Battery Co.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.