Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Avis v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

Plaintiff: Gary Avis
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
 
Case Number: 2:2008cv00450
Filed: May 9, 2008
 
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County: FRANKLIN
Presiding Judge: Algenon L. Marbley
Referring Judge: Terence P Kemp
 
Nature of Suit: Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Search for this case: Avis v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Avis
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.