Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Madzia v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.

Plaintiff: Derek Madzia
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
 
Case Number: 2:2008cv00474
Filed: May 16, 2008
 
Court: Ohio Southern District Court
Office: Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County: HARRISON
Presiding Judge: James L Graham
Referring Judge: Norah McCann King
 
Nature of Suit: Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Search for this case: Madzia v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derek Madzia
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
Search Dockets [ Dockets ]
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.