Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Musselman v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution

Petitioner:Mark Musselman
Respondent:Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
 
Case Number:3:2009cv00407
Filed:October 27, 2009
 
Court:Ohio Southern District Court
Office:Dayton Office [ Court Info ]
County:MONTGOMERY
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Rose
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Michael R Merz
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - General
Cause:28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:None
Search for this case: Musselman v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Musselman
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.