Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

USA v. $343,069 in United States Currency

Plaintiff:USA
Defendant:$343,069 in United States Currency
 
Case Number:4:2008cv00683
Filed:November 19, 2008
 
Court:Oklahoma Northern District Court
Office:Drug Related Seizure of Property Office [ Court Info ]
County:Tulsa
Presiding Judge:Judge Terence Kern
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Frank H McCarthy
 
Nature of Suit:Forfeiture / Penalty - Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Amount Demanded:$343,000.00
Search for this case: USA v. $343,069 in United States Currency
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $343,069 in United States Currency
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.