Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Aneja v. Great Plains Regional Medical Center

Plaintiff:Raji Aneja
Defendant:Great Plains Regional Medical Center
 
Case Number:5:2009cv00104
Filed:January 26, 2009
 
Court:Oklahoma Western District Court
Office:Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County:Beckham
Presiding Judge:Honorable Joe Heaton
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:1441 Petition for Removal
Amount Demanded:$390,000.00
Search for this case: Aneja v. Great Plains Regional Medical Center
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raji Aneja
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Great Plains Regional Medical Center
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.