Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Henrik Klinge Retained Trust v. Triumph Apparel Corp.

Plaintiff:Henrik Klinge Retained Trust
Defendant:Triumph Apparel Corp.
 
Case Number:1:2009cv01812
Filed:September 22, 2009
 
Court:Pennsylvania Middle District Court
Office:Harrisburg Office [ Court Info ]
County:York
Presiding Judge:Chief Judge Yvette Kane
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson
 
Nature of Suit:Real Property - Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause:28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jurisdiction:Diversity
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Amount Demanded:$75,000.00
Search for this case: Henrik Klinge Retained Trust v. Triumph Apparel Corp.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henrik Klinge Retained Trust
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Triumph Apparel Corp.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.