Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Singleton v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company

Plaintiff:Barbara Singleton
Defendant:Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
 
Case Number:1:2009cv00155
Filed:March 30, 2009
 
Court:Rhode Island District Court
Office:Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office [ Court Info ]
County:Providence
Presiding Judge:Judge Mary M Lisi
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge David L. Martin
 
Nature of Suit:Labor - Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:29:1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Search for this case: Singleton v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Singleton
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.