Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Decisioning.com Inc v. Federated Dept Store, et al

 
Case Number:3:2003cv01924
Filed:June 9, 2003
 
Court:South Carolina District Court
Office:Patent Office [ Court Info ]
Presiding Judge:Judge Cameron M Currie
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:35:271 Patent Infringement
Search for this case: Decisioning.com Inc v. Federated Dept Store, et al
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search for: Decisioning.com Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Search for: Federated Dept Store
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.