Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name:
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Sorkin v. Universal Building Products

Plaintiff:Felix L Sorkin
Defendant:Universal Building Products
 
Case Number:1:2008cv00133
Filed:March 12, 2008
 
Court:Texas Eastern District Court
Office:Patent Office [ Court Info ]
County:Anderson
Presiding Judge:Judge Ron Clark
Presiding Judge:Judge Thad Heartfield
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:35:271 Patent Infringement
Search for this case: Sorkin v. Universal Building Products
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felix L Sorkin
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Defendant: Universal Building Products
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.