Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name:
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation

Plaintiff:MedioStream Inc
Defendant:Microsoft Corporation
 
Case Number:2:2008cv00369
Filed:September 30, 2008
 
Court:Texas Eastern District Court
Office:Patent Office [ Court Info ]
County:XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:Judge David Folsom
Presiding Judge:Judge T. John Ward
 
Nature of Suit:Intellectual Property - Patent
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:35:271 Patent Infringement
Search for this case: MedioStream Inc v. Microsoft Corporation
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MedioStream Inc
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Search Patents[ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.