Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Four States Doty, Inc.

Plaintiff:Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:Four States Doty, Inc.
 
Case Number:5:2009cv00141
Filed:September 30, 2009
 
Court:Texas Eastern District Court
Office:Texarkana Office [ Court Info ]
County:Dallas
Presiding Judge:Judge David Folsom
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven
 
Nature of Suit:Civil Rights - Employment
Cause:42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jurisdiction:U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:Plaintiff
Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Four States Doty, Inc.
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Four States Doty, Inc.
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.