E-Watch, Inc v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd et al
(What's this?)
What is the EasyEdit button?
This website gets better when people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help)
| Plaintiff: | E-Watch, Inc |
|---|---|
| Defendant: | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd, Panasonic Digital Communications & Security Company and Panasonic Corporation of North America |
| Case Number: | 9:2007cv00070 |
| Filed: | March 28, 2007 |
| Court: | Texas Eastern District Court |
| Office: | Lufkin Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | Angelina |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Ron Clark |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Thad Heartfield |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Patent |
| Cause: | 35:271 Patent Infringement |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: E-Watch, Inc v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd et al | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: E-Watch, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
| Defendant: Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
| Defendant: Panasonic Digital Communications & Security Company | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
| Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Search Patents | [ USPTO Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ||| Google Assignee Name | Inventor Name | Full Text ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: Angelina County Patent Lawyers and Texas Patent Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.