Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Escamilla v. Quarterman

Petitioner:Licho Escamilla
Respondent:Nathaniel Quarterman
 
Case Number:3:2006cv02248
Filed:May 2, 2008
 
Court:Texas Northern District Court
Office:Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office [ Court Info ]
County:Dallas
Presiding Judge:Judge Jerry Buchmeyer
Presiding Judge:Judge Reed C O'Connor
Referring Judge:Magistrate Judge Irma C Ramirez
 
Nature of Suit:P. Petitions - Death Penalty
Cause:Federal Question
Jurisdiction:Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Search for this case: Escamilla v. Quarterman
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Licho Escamilla
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Search Dockets[ Dockets ]
Search Blogs[ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ]
Search News[ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance[ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web[ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ]


The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.